Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

?
Lv 6
? 發問於 Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 2 月前

Do you know how to tell that what you did is indefinable? ?

When your defense lawyers don't even try to defend it and just do a whataboutism song and dance for their closing argument

2 個解答

相關度
  • doug v
    Lv 7
    2 月前
    最愛解答

    Assuming you meant "indefensible" (auto correct? - & no chance to edit/correct) you are correct.

    Not only whataboutism (the House managers did some of that, too) but outright lies.

    The ex's "defense" team (who "ramshackeld" their way through it) made many statements that are provably false - in the well of the Senate, no less.

    But then, look who they're defending - the former Liar-in-chief whose stock-in-trade is lies. Yikes!

     

    資料來源: PS: Their whatabouts were False Equivalencies, too. Telling crowds to "fight" for things like Health Care, End of Systemic Racism, etc/etc/etc is NOT equal to telling them to "fight like hell" to overturn a fair & free election!
  • 匿名
    2 月前

    fascists trying to impeach a president for political rhetoric and the sheeple cheering it on wondering why its wrong - unbelievable 

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。