Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

Despite freedom of speech, do you think that inciting a riot is a valid reason to suspend a Twitter account?

3 個解答

相關度
  • 4 月前

    Because of freedom speech, no reason is needed to suspend an account.  Freedom of speech means that Twitter has the freedom to decide whom to allow to have an account and whom to ban.  Forcing them to allow Trump, or anyone, would violate Twitter's freedom of speech.

    If Trump wants to speak, he can start his own website.  That is his freedom.  Not forcing his speech onto someone else's website.

  • 匿名
    4 月前

    Yes. This isn't "despite" anything. Freedom of speech guarantees a private business the right to decide what types of speech that they will allow on their platforms. To require otherwise is to compel speech. Government-compelled speech violates the First Amendment.

    資料來源: Wooley v. Maynard
  • Steve
    Lv 5
    4 月前

    Well, they have deleted other accounts for inciting violence. 

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。