Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Liberals & Conservatives: I'd be glad to hear your views on this. An idea for Soc. Sec. reform.?
Propose this in 2009:
START A BILL TO PLACE ALL POLITICIANS ON SOCIAL SECURITY
---------------------- ------------
SOCIAL SECURITY:
(This is worth reading. It is short and to the point.)
Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.
Our Senators and Congresswomen do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it.
You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan.
In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.
For all practical purposes their plan works like this:
When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die.
Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments..
For example, Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7, 800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275, 000.00 during the last years of their lives.
This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.
Younger Dignitaries who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives.
Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. NADA..! ZILCH.....
This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;
"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK "!
From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer). We can expect to get an average of
$1,000 per month
After retirement.
Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!
Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.
That change would be to:
Jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen.. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us
Then sit back......
And see how fast they would fix it.
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve.
Same could go for Health Care.
12 個解答
- Little clevLv 41 十年前最愛解答
Like most plans the government doesn't want to be involved in their own creations. I like the fact that you only have to serve one term to get a retirement package for life. I need to talk to my employer about that deal because it sounds sweet to me.
- ?Lv 71 十年前
McCain gets $1,930 a month from 'broken' Social Security system
John McCain cashes his monthly Social Security checks despite calling the federal program "a disgrace," the Associated Press reports.
In 2007, he received benefits of $23,157 from Social Security, approximately $1,930 a month. The maximum monthly benefit under Social Security is $2,185. Social Security benefits are determined by age at retirement.
In 2006, McCain's wife Cindy earned $6 million, and has a net worth of approximately $100 million.
what is wrong with this picture?
- ?Lv 51 十年前
I'm a federal retiree, and I don't get close to what these folks get. My first full year of govt employment was 1974. I had to move from Butler, Pa (North of Pittsburgh) and move my wife and possesions to Austin, Tx. The govt gave me $150 to pay for the move, my wages for the year $4257.00. I paid a car payment, and rent on less than $347 after taxes each month. If the wife didn't work, we would have not been able to live. So, I want what they (Senaters) have. Free for life, unlimited medical, a pay check for life, and never had to really work for it.
- viablerenewablesLv 71 十年前
At the same time we should get control of our government by making our representatives accountable. This accountability could be achieved by limiting bills/laws to 1 narrowly defined good idea. A addition might be to limit the length of the bill to a understandable readable level. This changes would as a side benefit end corruption - no lobbyist is rich enough to bribe enough people to insure passage.
But we have to remember the government thinks it is ROYALTY.
- Hybrid MomentsLv 61 十年前
All federal employees receive a pension after they retire its not just congress people its everyone that works and is employed by the US federal government.
Congress people are Representatives of their districts because we don't have a direct democracy like Switzerland a rep has to be in good health and their financial situation has to be taken care of in order for them to stay focused.
- 5 年前
definite. The consonants and vowels are in the splendid places, yet those that have been "knowledgeable" in the process the Reagan and Bush Sr. situations choose demagogues like Rush Lumpaugh, Glenn Bunk, and Calamity Hannity, to tell them what to think of. The Repugnicons are on the run... that's why they are able to basically react to Obama's regulations. they have not got any techniques of their very own, they are able to basically attempt to tear down Obama's techniques, and, failing that, slander Obama as a man or woman. The Republican "management" have been performing like a team of whiny toddlers simply by fact the election. They have been enormous individuals to the cutting-edge mess, and that they might desire to grownup up and paintings to remedy the themes, no longer sit down in the midst of the floor and carry their breath till their faces turn blue. they're having a temper tantrum, and it quite is getting grotesque. The "birthers," who're much extra stupid than PETA, do no longer seem to realize that they are hurting their reason. The GOP, who have been those that began the dumba** hearsay, at the instant try to distance themselves from the silliness. to respond to your question - NO. they do no longer hear lots of something, different than the 1st word or 2 of a sentence, then they bypass off to the storage to commence making indications and plan some a million/2 a**ed protest they call "tea events." they're egged on via morons like Glenn Bunk, and that Hannity clown. that's all they hear, and regrettably, that's all they are going to study. many times, listening and discovering advise exchange; via definition, conservatives do no longer prefer exchange, so they simply pretend to hearken to. Republicans, and the human beings who declare they're, have tried to develop a subculture of outrage at present; it quite is not of their ultimate hobbies in the event that they have been to assert each and every little thing is going to be ok. So that's that it is not simply by fact they do no longer hear, they are able to discover the money for listening to aids, they do exactly no longer provide a s*** what you think of. they have their schedule, and it quite is not inevitably on your ultimate hobbies. money's the sport here.
- 匿名1 十年前
Thanks for copying and pasting that e-mail, but it has already been debunked in 2005.
Members of congress have been paying into Social Security since 1983, making your rant more than a quarter of a century too late.
資料來源: http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/congression... http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=21 - vinny_says_relaxLv 71 十年前
Personally I'm for chucking all 535 out on their assses and starting over.
Most couldnt get a job picking grapes anyway.
- 匿名1 十年前
I agree with you 100% . Very good point star for you
- 匿名1 十年前
I know... save enough money for retirement.