Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
How do anthropologists know whether skeletons of ancient humans were male or female?
You read any anthropological literature and they'll refer to a skeleton as male or female but they can't possibly know. Perhaps that individual they erroneously call male identified as a female. These anthropologists obviously know nothing about science and they're just hate filled cis transphobes.
9 個解答
- 匿名4 星期前最愛解答
Ancient humans knew they were male or female and stayed that way.
- Godless GazooLv 74 星期前
There are several ways. The easiest to see if the pelvis of a female is much more open for childbirth. But you can tell even from just a skull.
- ?Lv 74 星期前
Adult emales have wider hips than adult males . There is also DNA and chemical.analysis,
Sometimes more than one person's bones are are used to make a skeleton.
Don't project and transfer your ignorance onto other people.
- ?Lv 74 星期前
Pelvis and brow ridge difference
But I'm sure a very few are wrong but why does that matter
- 匿名4 星期前
That depends.
For non Christian anthropologists they examine the pelvis and skull.
Christian anthopologists count the ribs, then give up because both sexes have the same number. It is at this point they hand it over to real scientists.
- 匿名4 星期前
A skeleton's overall size and sturdiness give some clues. Within the same population, males tend to have larger, more robust bones and joint surfaces, and more bone development at muscle attachment sites. However, the pelvis is the best sex-related skeletal indicator, because of distinct features adapted for childbearing. The skull also has features that can indicate sex, though slightly less reliably.