Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
is it unfair that elite law schools dominate the Supreme Court?
Read the backgrounds of the Justices on the Supreme Court. There are 205 approved law schools in America, yet the elite ones' graduates dominate the Supreme Court [and Congress]. Is this inherently unfair to minorities and lawyers from poorer families and if so, what should be done about it?
9 個解答
- 匿名2 年前
No. That is the way it should be where government schools are common
- StephenWeinsteinLv 72 年前
No. Only the best lawyers should be on the Supreme Court, and the best lawyers disproportionately (although not exclusively) tend to come from the elite law schools. It's not inherently unfair to minorities because elite law schools tend to go out of their way to have minority students -- even ones who wouldn't have been allowed into an elite school if they were white.
- SamLv 72 年前
In our country everything revolves around money. Its a shame that's how it is but that is how it is.
- 2 年前
No
What is unfair is when chuckleheads pretend Liberty University is the same as Harvard and pack in the Know Nothings as political patronage.
- 匿名2 年前
No.
- 匿名2 年前
Elite law schools admit students primarily based on LSAT scores and college grades. It's only to be expected that graduates of those schools are more likely to end up on the Supreme Court.
- 匿名2 年前
lol, I wonder if any of the justices cheated their way into those schools.
