Why do the boot-lickers on YA love "WALLS" and Tariffs? Do they hate freedom? Is it the influence of government schools? What is going on?

any wall built will be taken down by future generations. a waste of taxpayers money and it won't work any way

There is no actual 'freedom' without law, ethics and morality.

Oppression comes from government in direct proportion to its increasing centralization, which is a process that involves and requires the parallel growth and expansion of criminal enterprise. Centralized government is then supposedly 'required' so that we can restrain this criminality, even though this always involves the surrendering of private resources and personal liberty in exchange for 'security' and 'safety'. Criminals recruit by pointing to the corruption and exploitation of government as it becomes increasingly centralized. They are partners in crime playing 'adversaries,' eventually joining forces directly when centralization is complete, proclaiming an end to crime itself, just as they proclaim an end to various crimes along the way which only advance under a new 'legal' disguise.

The purpose of both tariffs and 'walls' designed to prevent any form of easy lawless ingress into the country is to slow the exploitation of slaves, (now known as 'undocumented workers' or 'gang members'), by limiting the flow of 'human traffic,' (once known as the 'slave trade'). By legally emancipating slaves, the government is now able to directly profit from the slave trade without public consequences, since slavery itself presumably doesn't exist by the noble fiat and official declarations of that same 'trusted' government. Legalizing prostitution by making video evidence of the crimes into 'protected art' and calling it 'pornography' has unleashed a highly profitable worldwide sex trade that also enables the government to imprison and deviantly rape whomever it wishes, (using criminal 'surrogates' to do the actual dirty work), while maintaining the appearance of lawful behavior and the 'heroic struggle' against crime that never seems to diminish at all until it is finally 'legalized' and rebranded, (go figure).

This is the unstoppable process that destroys civilization itself if left unchecked. It has done so perennially in every culture throughout history. It is the same process which our founders sternly admonished us to avoid starting in the first place by never allowing government to centralize its power under any 'noble' pretext and which they established their ingenious system of checks and balances to enable us to successfully defeat whenever government does actually manage to centralize its power anyway, (as they have during this current era).

The free flow of foreigners into the waiting arms of organized criminal insurgencies disguised as 'social justice' movements, 'Democratic' political parties and 'cool' tribal gangs celebrated by Hollywood for their violence, sexual perversion and overt psychopathy is at the heart of a need for 'walls' and 'tariffs' among an array of other social tools allowing us to fight lawlessness while also restraining the fox of centralized government from 'helping' to guard the hen house for us. Centralized government doesn't want 'walls' or tariffs. Decentralized power, (also known as the 'private citizenry'), acting through its own mechanisms wants them and requires them under such extreme circumstances.

.

Our current President is hated so vigorously and defamed so openly not because he is a 'bad' person or significantly different from most other modern public figures, but because he stands against this growing criminal oppression and is willing to demonstrate a commitment to restoring a balance of power along with a return to an America free of this particular demon and dedicated to laws which can actually be enforced without the need for further exploitation, corruption and centralization.

It is not the influence of government that is creating this desire but the call back to liberty from the oppression of centralized power and its criminal underbosses, slave traders and political agitants, each wearing various 'modern' disguises; a call emanating from within our own American system and social structure, which is capable of purging itself using its own medicine chest of checks and balances, (including 'billionaire bullies'). 'Walls' and tariffs are among its many medicines but only represent one course of treatment against a particularly virulent strain of human oppression.

We must start somewhere. Obviously, those of us who still value liberty felt that we could not wait any longer to begin this process. The loud sizzling and immediate seething reaction of the festering pus represented by Washington and Hollywood to the administration of this medicine, (or even to its suggestion), should clearly demonstrate why it is necessary, leaving no lingering doubts about the healthy motive for administering it; despite the epileptic seizures, defamatory gibberish and head-spinning of the Press, the mendacious public spin of smiling celebrities or demagogue politicians feigning 'democratic' compassion and all other hapless tools of government oppression and criminality desperate to avoid personal exposure as aspiring aristocrats and trying to avoid the necessary social death required by the original American vision of human liberty and equality.

Re walls:: Good fences make good neighbors. Re tariffs: They are an excellent tool with which to address trade abuses, such as dumping or refusal by a nation to import products from the US. Not sure what all this has to do with government ownership and control of schools, but that is certainly something we should get rid of for other reasons.

Tariffs are very effective. Just look up the tariffs other countries put on U.S. goods. The wall will never happen, but it's a good negotiating point. The dems said they'd never consider it, but now they are.

Can you be more specific about who the 'boot lickers' are supposed to be? I prefer loafers . . . not to lick, but because they are comfy on me feety-feets!

We want to control who comes in and out of our country to protect American citizens. Are you really that dense that you can't grasp that simple concept?