Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Libs complain that Benghazi was investigated and no evidence was found. Should we now appoint a Special Prosecutor since that's what they do?
To find evidence. There hasn't been evidence found in 6 months of the Trump presidency that Russia had an effect on the votes that put him in office---so they appoint a Special Prosecutor who is willing to find anything. We need one for Hillary too.
7 個解答
- 匿名4 年前
Feel free if you want to be humiliated again. BTW, your statement is incorrect - Mueller hasn't YET come out and said he's found evidence of an effect on the votes, but the investigation ISN'T OVER YET.
- sandplant16Lv 74 年前
Please do start the 9th investigation of Benghazi against Hillary. Cannot think of anything that could help Democrats more!
- GregLv 74 年前
You and your imaginary friend don't really count as a "we" guy.
Think Trump's criminal lawyer just jumped ship because of that pile of evidence that "wasn't" found?
- 4 年前
No need to. Obama didn't fire any FBI chiefs to hinder an investigation.
- 匿名4 年前
Go ahead. The GOP controls every branch of govt. If it were a real issue it would have already been done.
- 匿名4 年前
Go for it. Conservatives control all three branches of government. There is literally nothing stopping you from appointing as many special prosecutors as you want. Perhaps you are waiting for our permission? Okay, we permit you to appoint a special prosecutor. Run along now and get started.
