Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Is the price decrease in gas a good or bad thing fro man environmentalist perspective?
IMO- The decrease in gas prices might attract more people to use more and more gas and buy gas cars. If fully electric cars aren't in larger production with cheaper costs, what implications do you think this will have on the environment with Climate change?
10 個解答
- JimZLv 75 年前
Cheaper gas is better for those who want to buy gas and it better for all those people who sell things other than gas. People have more money to buy things and they can be transported more cheaply. From the so called environmentalist's perspective, typically they would say it bad because they are idiots. I love the environment as much as anybody but I think the government has enough revenue and spends way too much. Cheap gas isn't bad for the environment but it is bad for those trying to push alternatives on us.
- campbelp2002Lv 75 年前
Fromm an environmentalist perspective cheap gas is bad, because it drives the competing alternatives out of business.
- KanoLv 75 年前
Electric cars use electricity generated from fossil fuel power stations, taking into account the 35% efficiency of power stn's, the loss from transmission lines, the loss of efficiency in batteries, it does not help the environment.
Raising the price might be okay, if the money was used for improving the infrastucture, but using it on useless renewables (and lining the pockets of the middle-men) is a terrible idea.
- SagebrushLv 75 年前
It is horrible to those who want to destroy us and who think they are the "Saviors of the Earth'.
Quote by Paul Ehrlich, professor, Stanford University: “Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
What it really means is that these 'environmentalists' would lose control. It is proven that they really don't care about the Earth and its population, they want CONTROL of all life on Earth.
Quote from the UN's Own "Agenda 21": "Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."
Although many on this site deny it, it is very clearly stated that these evil monsters want control of every human life. One of the best ways of gaining control is control the energy. For example, these miscreants controlled the energy costs in the UK so completely that hundreds of people froze to death. It mattered not to these miscreants, they went on their merry way and attempted to put a band-aid on it. Not one of these 'Saviors of the Earth' will take any responsibility for those who needlessly lost their lives in a horrible way. These are truly a sick minded people, yet they want to control you by metering out energy to you.
- virtualguy92107Lv 75 年前
It's great for the consumer. Wall street, and the rest of the world's stock markets seem to have a different opinion - which may indicate that they are on a different side than the average consumer or working stiff.
- ?Lv 75 年前
GOOD THING since earth's environment was never affected. This is what happens when a ex-President lies to the public. I'll bet even today. If you asked George W. Bush how it affected the environment. infact I dare you & then tell us what he says. He lives on his ranch in Texas. Global Command
資料來源: Global Warming Logic - 匿名5 年前
Its a good thing for the workers and people .
Not for the Alarmist and Obama .They want UK
style prices $10.00 a gallon . They could care less about the poor people only the elites