Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

?
Lv 7
? 發問於 Science & MathematicsMathematics · 7 年前

I'm thinking, few people use math beyond introductry algebra in their life work, and often there are other ways?

such as trial and error estimates, graphical solutions, hand books and tables, google and Wikipedia. How about a college though PHD that teaches alternate math for such things as differential equations, and much more advanced. I suspect there are great minds out there who just can't grasp very advanced math.

更新:

I agree about 7 million of the 7 billion people on Earth use those very advanced math skills. The other 99.9 % have forgotten them, if they ever learned them. My field was Electronic Engineering: Most of my supervisors could no longer do even high school level math. I took advance algebra, geometry, solid geometry and trigonometry in high school. Solid geometry was most useful as it helped me visualize things in 3 dimensions, but there must be other ways to gain a three dimension understanding.

3 個解答

相關度
  • Gary H
    Lv 7
    7 年前
    最愛解答

    Well...

    Of course there are great minds who "can't grasp" advanced math. There are great minds who "can't grasp" poetry. There are highly educated people who can barely hold a conversation with the person behind the counter at Dunkin Donuts.

    As far as how many people use math beyond algebra in their work life... If you work behind the counter at Dunkin Donuts, yeah. However, if you work in almost any manufacturing environment, you are very likely to use statistics or, at least, be able to understand and react appropriately to statistical measurements. If you deal with drawings, trig and geometry are important. Graphical representation of data is certainly a very important skill with enormous variety of applications but, if you are dealing with things more complicated than donuts, advanced math is involved in generating those graphs. You need to recognize that computers are really really stupid, garbage in, garbage out. So... if you don't understand what the computer program is doing, you won't have a clue whether the "answer" is right or wrong. Mathematic models are very important in all sorts of applications and there can be a whole lot of advanced math. And... "trial and error" is very expensive. Do your really want to buy a car or a TV or a cell phone or a computer or fly in an airplane or be x-rayed by your dentist with equipment that was designed by "trial and error"?

    Those who are most dangerous are those who don't know that they don't know. If you think our modern world can continue to operate and progress using only handbooks and tables and trial and error, then you seriously lack an understanding of what surrounds you every day.

  • 7 年前

    How do you do! What level do you have acheaved yet? Thede a few men once will grasp almost all your buisness due to it include hiigh tech devices that are own by them. Accelerometre can't be build without first rate equation just as modern rockets for any dynamics aims that demands second rate diff equations. And so to save himself from them as well being invisible. That is only second derivative to do. By your PC you can just now give information in ANY point on Earth about aims as well. Anu document is relation one to another as psihology too. Trust me it is very powerfull method for defence since deal with information. Single strenth of flock is its big size vasting like internet.

  • Huh
    Lv 6
    7 年前

    I'm assuming you are having trouble in math. Well, you can always be an animator or a musician or a therapist, or a writer, or a firefighter.

    With math: you can be a chemist, physicist, engineer, or a business person.

    Then, there's subgroups, like organic chemists, inorganic chemists, pharmaceutical chemists, analytical chemists.

    Even when people predict the weather like it will be cloudy with a lot of rain and a windchill of -28 degrees Fahrenheit, and thunderstorms......somebody predicted that.....probably using calculus.

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。