Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

Have physicists switched to a verificationist approach when it comes to Big Bang?

Is Big Bang falsifiable, or is it unchallengeable objective truth? If it is falsifiable, then how can it be falsified?

更新:

Actually, it looks a lot more like data is made to fit the theory, when dark energy and dark matter were invented out of nothing to keep the Big Bang theory alive. If something new and unexpected comes up, I guess we will see more ad hoc hypotheses to prop it up. That does not sound like Big Bang is falsifiable, unlike Einstein's theory of relativity.

3 個解答

相關度
  • 9 年前
    最愛解答

    The Big Bang is the best fit theory for the evidence we have from an expanding universe to the cosmic microwave background radiation. All the pieces fit. In a court of law this is called "A Preponderance of the Evidence.". When the weight of all the pieces becomes heavy enough and there is no evidence to the contrary, the weight of the evidence is accepted as proof. All that is required is evidence to the contrary to invalidate the proof.

  • 7 年前

    Universal background radiation confirms the Big Bang. No need to switch to verification.

  • There are so many holes in the big bang.

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。