Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
OldPilot
A question for Fundamentalist .?
Now that we have answered your question, please attempt to answer mine.
Is the Christian Bible LITERAL truth or do the early books, at least, contain myth and legend? Fundamentalism fails if the Bible is not literally true. So, you need to logically defend that.
Please, we try to answer your questions, take a shot at one of ours.
Is the Tower of Babel a myth? Can't prove it, but it sure smells like one. You can't get to Heaven by building a tower (The writer of the story seems to think it would be possible and God had to take action to prevent success.).
Which leads us to: Why did God bother to confound the languages? The project was doomed by Physics already in place. Thus, it is likely a myth of the form of, "How the Leopard Got its Spots."
The whole story rests on the false assumption that it would be possible to build a tower to Heaven and God had to take action to prevent success. Show us your argument for this alleged true story. We are waiting.
7 個解答Religion & Spirituality6 年前Ok, lets turn this around: Why do Fundamentalist believe in such a weak god that is a poor engineer?
The rest of the universe is governed by a set of consistent, rational laws that allow the universe to run on full automatic. Why would God design biology to work different and require constant hands-on-control.
Creationists have a weak, stupid god that built a universe that requires constant tweaking. Their god is a poor engineer. It makes more sense that biology would work like the rest of the universe, self correcting, self regulating, and self modifying. Thus, His creatures can change as their environment changes. That is all evolution is, the plants and animals adapting to their changing environment (That is glorious!).
Evolution is an extremely elegant solution to life on a planet with a changing environment. Only a Master Engineer could come up with such an elegant solution for a self-correcting system. The Creationists severely limit God's intelligence and engineering ability by saying He had to sit and create everything by hand when the whole system is automated. Seems disrespectful.
2 個解答Biology7 年前Ok, lets turn this around: Why do Fundamentalist believe in such a weak god that is a poor engineer?
The rest of the universe is governed by a set of consistent, rational laws that allow the universe to run on full automatic. Why would God design biology to work different and require constant hands-on-control.
Creationists have a weak, stupid god that built a universe that requires constant tweaking. Their god is a poor engineer. It makes more sense that biology would work like the rest of the universe, self correcting, self regulating, and self modifying. Thus, His creatures can change as their environment changes. That is all evolution is, the plants and animals adapting to their changing environment (That is glorious!).
Evolution is an extremely elegant solution to life on a planet with a changing environment. Only a Master Engineer could come up with such an elegant solution for a self-correcting system. The Creationists severely limit God's intelligence and engineering ability by saying He had to sit and create everything by hand when the whole system is automated. Seems disrespectful.
10 個解答Religion & Spirituality7 年前Want to know the science of what is going on with the Japanesee reactors?
Good place to start:
1 個解答Engineering1 十年前How to defend Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?
How to defend Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: (I am almost afraid to post this. His defense team could do it and it might work.) Mohammed did not do it. September 11, 2001 was a conspiracy by the Bush Administration. The defense team would put 9/11 conspiracy theorists that have “proof” of the inside job on the stand with their proof. This would expose the theorists to cross examination and require that they present a complete, rational, plausible explanation for 9/11 that does not include 19 fanatical Islamists, high-jacking 4 airliners, and flying them into buildings. If they don’t do it is pretty good proof that the conspiracy theories cannot stand up to the rules of evidence and the theorists are full of crap. Or, the defense team is also in on the conspiracy and won’t put on the best defense, “My client is innocent. He did not do it and I can prove who did.”
2 個解答Physics1 十年前