Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Linear algebra question , help!?
For a square matrix B , let tr(B) denote the trace of B. Suppose A is a real 3*3 matrix such that tr( A) = tr(A^2 )= tr(A^3 ) = 0.
Prove that A^3=0.
2 個解答
- 1 十年前最愛解答
It is easy to show that the set of eigenvalues of A^k is the set of k-th degrees of eigenvalues of A.
tr(B) = trace(B) is the sum of all eigenvalues of B, so as tr(A) = tr(A^2) = tr(A^3) = 0 we have (denote the eigenvalues of A a, b, c - three complex numbers)
a + b + c = 0, a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 0, a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 0. Let's show that a = b = c.
Really, if a, b and c are all distinct numbers, then the matrix (a b c; a^2 b^2 c^2; a^3 b^3 c^3) is invertible because its determinant is not equal to zero (similar to Vandermonde one), so the corresponding homogeneous system has a single solution and we know this solution: a = b = c = 0. If all a, b and c are equal then they are of course equal to zero. If for example a = b, then c = -2a, c^2 = -2a^2 and hence a = 0 and c = 0. So a = b = c = 0 in any case.
So the Jordan normal form of A is an upper triangular matrix with all the numbers on the diagonal equal to zero. It is trivial that then its third degree is equal to zero and so the JNF of A^3 is equal to zero. Then, of course, A^3 = 0.
- Nick SLv 51 十年前
I can now honestly say that brute force, while seemingly effective, is not necessarily the best idea on a problem like this. The link provided gives a word document that gives the exact approach, start to finish, that I used.
Again, while not ideal, it was effective, and did eventually give me a result, albeit not quite the one I had originally expected.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/rnzodl
Critiques are encouraged, and feel free to point out any errors, as arithmetic is often a fickle beast...
Another approach would be to say that the trace of A is the sum of the eigenvalues of A, and the trace of A^2 is the sum of eigenvalues of A^2, trace of A^3 is the sum of the eigenvalues of A^3...
You might be able to use the relations you get out of that to tackle this problem in a much shorter, more elegant way, but as I just thought of it and haven't tried it yet, I can't be sure.