Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Bruce
Is Trump against just radical Islamist terrorism or all terrorism?
Is he against just radical terrorists, or all terrorist?
Is he against white supremist terrorism?
6 個解答Politics4 年前How long before deniers cherry-pick the middle troposphere to claim “No warming in X years”?
2015 clearly has the warmest surface and ocean temperatures on record, for both raw and corrected data. Given the delay for the El Nino heat to spread toward the poles and up to 5 miles into the air, record temperatures for the lower troposphere are probably only months away.
Now above the troposphere, the stratosphere has been cooling, as predicted by the AGW climate models. So interpolating between the warming lower troposphere and the cooling stratosphere I expect a layer with little if any warming
.
Yeah, that’s it. The middle troposphere must be pretty stable.
So to claim “No warming in X years”, how long before deniers cherry-pick data for the middle troposphere?
9 個解答Global Warming5 年前Is this a fair summary of Ottmar Edenhoffer’s view?
Floating around the web and frequently repeated here, is a mis-quote by Ottmar Edenhofer of the IPCC. Out of context it makes it look like the IPCC’s objective is global wealth redistribution, and that climate change is a good excuse to justify it. The actual oringinal quote came from a German article that was then translated and misrepresented by a British climate denier with dodgy financial backing. The original German can be found on line, and the meaning has been twisted.
My overview of Edenhoffer’s views, after reading more about him on Google and Wikipedia is:
The science of global warming is sound and not controversial among scientists whose job it is to estimate the truth. By adversely affecting the whole planet, the rich countries have already confiscated some of the wealth of the poorer nations. That is a transfer of wealth.
And if some people must leave oil and coal in the ground, or get taxed to cause CO2 reduction, then that also is a transfer of wealth. This is defacto wealth redistribution. So the problem goes far beyond the science of global warming. The issue is not just the environment. It becomes an economic and political problem.
7 個解答Global Warming5 年前Have you watched this model run?
It is at http://www.nasa.gov/press/goddard/2014/november/na...
It is amazing to watch, to see how complicated the model output is!
(it is just CO2 distribution, not as complicated as temperature, vapor, and climate, but it gives an idea what the climate modelers are capable of.
10 個解答Global Warming5 年前Does this graph answer any questions about "adjusted' global temperature data?
But the RAW data shows even MORE warming than the "adjusted data".
This is mainly due to th eoceans, wherer adjustments to a slower rise overshadow the small increase of rise over land.
See figure 4 of http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/part_2_...
Or see http://variable-variability.blogspot.de/2015/02/ho...
11 個解答Global Warming6 年前SHOULD WE USE THE RAW DATA? We are familiar with the land temperature data,?
But the adjusted data for the ocean, and thus for the total globe shows LESS warming than the raw data. That is right, raw data shows MORE warming.
1 個解答Global Warming6 年前Have you checked out these Record Temperatures?
They list records for each country.
The highs are more recent, the lows are less recent.
8 個解答Global Warming7 年前When is Science actually settled? I have a book, ISBN 0-932766-20-x, published in 2005 titled "The Earth is not Moving"?
It claims, contrary to Galileo and Copernicus, that the Sun and stars go around the Earth. Does that mean the science is not settled?
7 個解答Global Warming7 年前