Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
SHOULD WE USE THE RAW DATA? We are familiar with the land temperature data,?
But the adjusted data for the ocean, and thus for the total globe shows LESS warming than the raw data. That is right, raw data shows MORE warming.
This is described, thanks to Zeke Hausfather, at
http://variable-variability.blogspot.de/2015/02/ho...
The original paper, by British scientists is at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/part_2_...
1 個解答
- ?Lv 56 年前
No, use the adjusted data, because it is the best estimate after correction for errors.
But note that over land and sea, overall, the supposedly "biased" scientists use LESS global warming than the raw data. If AGW is a hoax, I would have expected them to make the data show MORE warming.