Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Are the proposed “solutions” for so called Global Warming far worse than any imaginable consequence of Global Warming?
8 個解答
- Davie BwoiLv 66 年前最愛解答
Yes, because the so called 'solutions' are destructive and real, whereas the bogey man, is not.
- MikeLv 76 年前
Absolutely. Now they are claiming that global warming leads to more wars and i responsible for the genocide in Darfur and Rwanda and the war in Syria. If you accept that logic then there are lots of countries that make money selling oil. If you take away oil money how many wars can we expect from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, UAE, Venezuela, and Yemen which is projected to have a higher population than Russia in 50 years?
Beyond that, the solution also involves higher energy costs for poor countries, and poor people in developing countries, leaving them less and less money to spend on other things, and forced to do without 'luxuries' like cars, houses, and more.
- ?Lv 56 年前
No,
Conservation saves money. Money spent insulating houses and installing solar puts money in the pockets of Americans, not Saudis, Russians, and Iranians.
Less coal saves lives now.
With technology and scale, the cost alternative energy is declining towards fossil fuel.
So much of the "cost" is not a net loss
- Who Dat ?Lv 76 年前
Most rational people immediately recognize that the numbers simply don't add up.
Some of them,like the guy in this link are pretty darn good with numbers too.
- KanoLv 76 年前
Economic depression, lost jobs, third world countries having more poverty, possible future conflict between the haves and the have nots.
Yes some warming would be great (not that we are going to get any) it would mean less heating costs, more agriculture, more habitable land available, a net gain.