Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Retirement from divorce - now split?
To split CA estate equally, one party kept the house and loan, while the other party was awarded an equal amount in retirement fund that gives a monthly income.
Now the spousal support needs to be recalculated, and one party says the retirement is income and should be listed, the other party says it should be excluded as income as it was awarded in the divorce.
What do you think? I have not listed which party chose what to minimize bias, it might not be who you think. Both parties have some other fairly equivalent income.
What do you think??
2 個解答
- 1 十年前最愛解答
This question amazes me SURLY when you where divorced and the estate was awarded to whichever side Surly that is the end of it . Whatever happens afterwards is nothing to do with the other party . Why are you still bickering after the settlement if you didn't contest the settlement and accepted it then Surly that is the end of it and you both go you re separate ways .
資料來源： life - JimLv 77 年前
You are right, the retirement MUST be excluded. If not, then the house must be also be placed back into the mix.
I have this scenario and I had the awarded retirement excluded from the calculations. Otherwise one party gets 3/4 and the other 1/4.
