Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
What do you think of a Constitutional Amendment that says the House and Senate must put any bill passed in the other chamber to the vote?
The Speaker of the House could not sit on Senate bills, The Senate Majority leader can’t sit on House Bills, perhaps a 60 day time limit. Any bill not rejected in 60 days passes automatically.
2 個解答
- 匿名5 月前
Sixty days isn't very long for the other chamber to committee, hear, debate and mark-up a piece of legislation, particularly a major or complicated one.
The Affordable Care Act was 2300 pages.
Require them to vote on everything in 60 days means they vote "no" simply because they haven't had the time or they vote "yes" without knowing about the fine print of the bill or without having a real understanding of what the impact of the legislation is likely to be. Doesn't sound like a great way to make decisions.
- Cul-De-Sac777Lv 45 月前
Authoritarianism and immediacy is not always the correct answer to these questions.
