Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

Fileserver question - Dedicated / Part sizes ...?

Hi, Linux gurus especially plz ...

I'm the guy who's always trying a workaround (mentally if not in physical practice) for the expensive stuff these days. My latest project idea moving up to the forefront of necessity is a large-size set of storage drives all accessible at the same time - an NAS/fileserver for about 6Gbs from the last 20 yrs of repairs/etc..

I have about 15-20 different Linux distro Live CD/DVDs, and want to build a fileserver from a simple case, ps, cpu, etc ... or from a pre-made barebones from the local Microcenter (Boston, MA).

I'm having trouble accessing multiple larger drives on the SATA/IDE combined HP pavilion a6119h desktop I've been using for about 3 years for repairs, copyings, and recovering/wiping all my old harddrives. Currently has a 1.5 Tb w/4 partitions running Slacko Puppy that won't use other drives on SATA2. (Likely an issue with Slacko / nbr of partitions, but COULD be HP hardware/Vista designed system).

So, I'd *like to* throw the cash at a RAID-capable barebones fileserver with say both the 1.5 and 2 Tb drives, and 1 or 2 more refurbs I might pick up later. In the meantime I could use another DVD burner (maybe a Bluray) or a couple 250Gb drives, or one of each, etc. ... It would be a 10-bay tower case with a 750-watt power supply btw, and a current CPU/Mboard bundle.

QUESTION(s) : 1) Anybody know where to find a free tutorial / diagram set to do this already, 2) Are most Linux distros CAPABLE of these configs/RAID-ed drive capacities?, 3) When connecting to the fileserver's RAID-ed drives will Windows have a problem with the drivesizes of the RAID system or is it "handled" by the RAID subsystem before mounting over the network?. I'd be connecting with a variety of XP, Vista, and 7, as well as some Linux.

Thanks,

25+ Winyears, 2 scattered linux yrs.

更新:

Hi Jeff P, Yes - several reasons. Most "commercially available" NAS boxes I've found are well over $275 and still have limitations to 1/2Tb drive maximums, and are built in small tower cases, plus only have WIRED network connections. I'm an open-case, drive-swapping, switchable-OS kinda guy with my workbench/burning/ripping systems. And the full system would allow larger drives, and more of them while a NAS isn't easily OS-upgradeable(?-especially in THAT price range). I'm even considering running the actual OS from a bootable 16-32Gb flashdrive for the extra $12-34.

更新 2:

Hi Jeff P, Yes - several reasons. Most "commercially available" NAS boxes I've found are well over $275 and still have limitations to 1/2Tb drive maximums, and are built in small tower cases, plus only have WIRED network connections. I'm an open-case, drive-swapping, switchable-OS kinda guy with my workbench/burning/ripping systems. And the full system would allow larger drives, and more of them while a NAS isn't easily OS-upgradeable(?-especially in THAT price range). I'm even considering running the actual OS from a bootable 16-32Gb flashdrive for the extra $12-34.

2 個解答

相關度
  • ?
    Lv 4
    8 年前
    最愛解答

    There are a number of dedicated nas distros that would suit your needs - freenas, nas4free, openfiler, etc. Probably better not to use zfs file system if your hardware is average.

    You may need to jumper newer sata hard drives for them to be seen by older boards, but they should still work.

  • Jeff P
    Lv 7
    8 年前

    Is there a particular reason why you would want to build this from scratch? I would just buy a NAS. Most already run some variant of Linux and will probably be a lot less of a hassle than building it from scratch.

還有問題嗎?立即提問即可得到解答。