Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
If I travel back in time it's not really the same time anymore is it?
For example, if I travel back to earth in the year 1900, it's not really 1900 as it was written in history right? Something is different. I'm there. So I didn't really travel back into time. I traveled to some place that's almost like 1900.
I'm just thinking the whole concept of traveling back into time isn't even conceptually sound, independent of how well the concept applies to reality.
That and "travel" refers to distance per time, not time per time. Time per time is a meaningless scalar. And since time isn't constant throughout the universe, we have to talk in terms of traveling to a certain space-time.
10 個解答
- ?Lv 79 年前最愛解答
There are in fact impossible paradoxes that ensue when talking about going back in time. I simply believe it's a false concept; that time doesn't have a backwards and a forwards, just a rate. It's a measure of change, and you can't "unchange" something without changing something else again. To go back in time you'd have to unchange the whole universe back to a certain point, which is impossible.
- Rafiq A. YafiLv 69 年前
You're travelling back-in-time. Set the course to 1900. You're there, and you will not see any difference until you make something that could change the future too. The Past and the Future will be the same according to Time Travel Concept. The Future is more accepted than going back in time to the Past by Scientists who always dwell in dreams.
'Travel around Earth' is Distance per Time. But when if you go far away from Earth, the Distance per Time calculation changes with respect to Time. The Time will start to run faster...
So think about Wormholes, it is a shortcut to some other place which is trillions of light years far away. Thus Time Travel is a mystery... It makes long distance into very short in time. Time Travel deals with all the nature of Physics.
- duke_of_urlsLv 79 年前
The usual way out of this in sci-fi is to say that your past actually does have you appearing there via time travel.
Time per time is a meaningless scalar only if you don't have a time machine.
Time is constant throughout the universe except where gravity or acceleration are involved.
- John WLv 79 年前
Not surprisingly there are two theories about that.
The first is that it is the same time because it's already happened and only self consistent actions could happen. This is called the Novikov Self-consistency principle.
The second is that it isn't the same time because it didn't happen like that in the time traveler's history. This is called the "Many Worlds Interpretation".
資料來源: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novikov_self-consiste... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpret... - cosmoLv 79 年前
One idea about past time travel is that youcan travel back to a point in the "many worlds" that is similar (or identical) to your past. You can then affect the future of that worldline, which will turn out different from the worldline you left.
- 9 年前
Typical time travel conundrum. Think about it this way, you could ever only travel back to the point in which the device to travel through time is created. If it wasn't ever created, it would never exist, thereore, wouldn't be possible. Your question is moot.
- ?Lv 59 年前
Since traveling back in time is not possible, this question can be tossed in the irrelevant pile.
- ?Lv 79 年前
The excepted theory is you would create another timeline
資料來源: The Universe on the History Channel - Irv SLv 79 年前
Have you considered that it might be the same time,
but there wouldn't be anything there anymore?
- 匿名9 年前
Does anybody REALLY know what time it is?
(does anybody really care?)