Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Should anyone want to be 'finite, exact and specific' are we only restricted to cite just numbers?
Whenever we tend to say anything we always run in danger to be misunderstood. Words seems to be translated differently from what we might have in mind. Some words could be used differently, with the exception of numbers. For example a stool might mean a chair or a table but two (2) or any other number cannot ever be meant a different numbers. Symbols could also be interpreted differently as well as gestures. Can we exchange and share messages finite and explicit other than by means of numbers?
1 個解答
- 匿名9 年前最愛解答
Yes, you have to use finite and specific language. Legal contracts use this type of language. You could in theory create a new language where the words only have 1 specific definition. It would be a language built entirely from jargon.