Is this a correct statement: Liberals are for individual rights for criminals but not for inborn babies?

yes, it is

I'm a Libertarian - not a liberal, and I support the rights of the mother to control her own body. The unborn are not babies, they are first, a fertilized egg, then a blastocyst, then an embryo and then a fetus. When they become babies, they have rights.

Criminals have basic human rights, but lose some of them when they are convicted.

Note to republicans....these are the people that vote for you! Can you believe how ignorant,ridiculous, silly, petty, and uninformed this question is? Wow, this is your platform...and you can do a better job of running the country?

By the way there is no such thing as "an unborn baby". They are babies after they leave the womb.

No, it's an incorrect statement on many levels.

But it's an interesting take on education.

Hahahahahaha! You really sound stupid - and so typically republican! Lush Limbo gives you a lie to repeat, and you get it screwed up because you're not smart enough to even know what the words mean.

inborn babies? Thankfully, there's no such thing.

Wow. I actually can't believe you're this stupid.