If freedom has to relate towards an amount of liberty that we could ever suggest, is it ever complete?

No, because eventually one person's freedom would encroach on another person's. Furthermore, there are some things we are not free to do because they are not logically possible. For example, we are not free to grow wings and fly.

Well I wanted to say "if everything was perfect universal agreement and synchronicity" would work. However then you have this problem of what perfection actually is.

I don't think liberty holds the key unless everyone had the same absolutes. That's why this push for the one world order is so frightening. The bigger the organisation the smaller the people become. Power is a massive pull for the rich who have nothing else to gain (in their minds) People would become fodder to gain that means in my opinion. And already are.

Time isn't yet understood, nor space or anything. But if everything went back into balance and became the way it was supposed to be then that must be how it works. Like a clock I suppose. Everything in its place. We are off kilter though, everything is tilted including man.

yes but for me the thought remains around reality, because if that is flowed then every thing is an illusion, it is our focus that determines our reality, but our focus is influenced by the society we live in, so we believe our selves to be free, but we're not, we are in fact all slaves to no masters all 6.6 billion of us forced to go to work live in one place buy the same food drive the same cars ...and so on, and believing we're free. and all the while our minds are slowly fading like a flame on a dieing candle we no longer have the need to think just follow.

there is no freedom any more for the world of man

what does the phrase 'an amount of liberty that we could ever suggest' mean?