Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。
Black Hole Theory....Does A Neutron Star Possess A Critical Mass/ Boiling Point?
With the understanding that "matter" is a "condensate" in "space,time" and that the fusion reactors we call stars inevitably die out and create a black hole around a neutron star......
Is it not plausible, that these existing super-dense masses, attract all that the rest of the surrounding energy, the universe exhausts in their direction?
With the previous statement confirmed then, is there a critical mass at which value the "matter" contained there in, "boils" under the pressure and reignites with enough force to re-establish a star (or several relative to the starting mass, energy produced and the gravitational effects of the surrounding environment.)
This would allow for infinite "time" simultaneously with finite "matter".
Answers appreciated...this has been buggin' me for years....please spare me any dimensional doorway theories, physics equations to explain humbly appreciated...Einstein I understand.
4 個解答
- 1 十年前最愛解答
An ordinary star doesn't boil; it fuses elements together into heavier elements. A neutron star has gone past that: because of intense gravitational pressure, all it's matter has fused together into what is essentially a giant atomic nucleus containing only neutrons.
Adding matter to a neutron star will not undo the fused state that it is in, to start nuclear reactions again. It may start to add so much mass, that space starts to warp around it and become a black hole.
Yes, if all the stars and neutrons, and everything else got clumped together, you would have one big monster black hole. It's intriguing to ask what's outside of it, if everything is inside of it.
On the black hole's event horizon, time stands still, so maybe your fourth paragraph should read "zero time simultaneously with finite matter".
- 匿名5 年前
A neutron star is one of two, possibly three things. 1. It is the end result of the collapse of a large star, and is effectively a giant neutron. 2. It is a larger star on it's way to becoming something not observed but mathematically probable, and even denser, a quark star. 3. It is an even larger star on it's way to the ultimate collapse to a black hole. Leaving aside the disputed quark star phase, the main difference is that a neutron star is a physical, solid body, whereas a black hole is, in one sense, nothing. What is usually illustrated in books and TV shows actually the event horizon. This is a region of space surrounding the singularity at the center. The distance from the event horizon to the singularity is determined by mass of the black hole. It can be seen from this that what we call a black hole is not a hole at all, and many physicists prefer the original name of collapsar. Black star is an apt description of the phenomenon. It describes an object with an escape velocity exceeding the speed of light. The main problem for science is describing what happens at the singularity. At that point, and it really is a point, all that we know of physics breaks down, and cannot give us the information, because time stops, and gravity becomes infinite. We simply don't have the tools to describe infinity or the cessation of time, though many physicists and cosmologists are working on the maths.
- 匿名1 十年前
Neutron stars have very high gravity, causing an enormous amount of pressure. As we know from Gay-Lussac's Gas Law, high pressure = low temperature. All of the matter rubbing together forms a great amount of heat, causing the pressures to balance out. There will be hydrostatic equilibrium. I don't think neutron stars can reignite.
- 1 十年前
You do not have a good understanding of what black holes and neutron stars are. Please do some more reading about the subject.