Californians what's your Favorite Prop 8 Slogan?

I really have to wonder about some people. You do realize that Homosexuals are not medically mutated, there is nothing to cure them of. I'm curious how you compare being allowed to kill 6 people a year is the same as being allowed to marry someone you love. Regardless of what you think about it everyone should be able to marry the person they love if the person loves them and wants to marry them. Luckily I don't think there will be enough people willing to deny people those rights and I have faith in the people of California as a whole.

"Crossroads" by utilising Cream (1968 Winterland Ballroom overall performance from the Wheels of hearth lp, no longer 2005 Royal Albert corridor overall performance). IMHO, purely the main kick *** stay guitar overall performance interior the background of rock music.

all very creative- but i am still voting yes. not because of discriminatory reasons, or because i don't think that gays should be able to marry- but because it does effect others rights- and it has in Massachusetts. I did a lot of research on this, because i do not take possibly not giving someone their rights very seriously- but what i found actually surprised me and changed my mind to yes. First- in california- same sex couples that enter into civil unions already are afforded the same rights as married couples. california is one of the few states that allow this without putting restrictions on their rights. but for others out there, that might be morally opposed to it, by legally recognizing it as the same as traditional marriage, it has opened up legal ramifications on people in Mass. that are morally opposed to it, and will do the same here in california. it then forces (with the exception of religous marriages because no one can force a religous institution to marry a couple that does not comply with their denominations standards) others to legally recognize and accept something that they are morally opposed to. justices of the peace were fired for refusing to marry same sex couples because of moral oppossition- catholic adoption agency had to close their doors under threat of law suits and loss of tax exempt status- and parents are not allowed to object or ask for any special notification should topics of this nature be taught in school, because the state does not recognize same sex marriages as different, therefore the schools do not have to either. while the actual wording of the prop does not change these things- the fact that the marriage will then be legally seen as the same as traditional marriage is what causes these other "aftermaths". so after getting some facts- i decided that same sex couples were really only gaining a title and a certain level of respect from the gov't, while others were then going to be forced to participate or accept something they are morally opposed to. (which gov't should never be able to do) so i will be voting yes for now. until there is a clause or something that makes it to where people can opt out of accepting/participating based on moral opposition- than i will be voting yes. it's not about hate- i have a few gay friends (one actually voting yes- but for different reasons :)- thinks marriage is stupid) and i love them- but to give them a title at the expense of someones morals didn't sit well with me...

I think it is appalling, It would be like setting up a law for psychopathic serial killers to be allowed 6 kills a year, because "they were born that way." and "Can't help what they are."

I wish they would do some real medical research into the underlying causes of homosexuality, so we can cure these people, fixing the underlying problem instead of applying a patch and pretending it doesn't exist.

this gives two positions on prop 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQY6qeUxhTg

YES ON 8!

NO TO THE TYRANNY OF THE MINORITY!

I support civil unions, but I am sick of gays trying to hijack marriage, and I'm sick of judges usurping the will of the people of California.

STOP TRYING TO FOIST YOUR BELIEFS ONTO OTHERS!