Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務，而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務，或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜，以及了解如何下載你的資料。
關於國際聯盟
(1)試評估國際聯盟於兩次世界大戰之間的年代在維護世界和平方面的成就及不足。
(2)你是否同意聯合國較國際聯盟更能有效維護世界和平？解釋你的答案。
2 個解答
- 1 十年前最愛解答
1.The League of Nation had successed in some disputes such as over Panzig , Silesia and the Aaland Islands . However , the League of Nation had more weakness . The clearest one , it could not stop the WW2 breakout . The League of Nation had two large defects which were no independent army and had not powerful members .When the League of Nation punished other countries , it only gave moral condemnation them first and then it would carried out economic sanction and it would use the military force which got from member countries . Nevertheless , it only took action to economic sanction and the result was not good because of few member countries .
Also , although the person of suggesting to organize the League of Nation was the president of the USA , it did not take part in this organization. The USSR also took prt in the League of Nation in a short time . Because of lacking of two super countries , the effect of the League of Nation was not large.
2. Yes ,I argee because the UN has more member countries including the USA and the USSR(Russia) .So , the power of effect is larger than the League of Nation .
資料來源： ME
