Yahoo 知識+ 將於 2021 年 5 月 4 日 (美國東岸時間) 停止服務,而 Yahoo 知識+ 網站現已轉為僅限瀏覽模式。其他 Yahoo 資產或服務,或你的 Yahoo 帳戶將不會有任何變更。你可以在此服務中心網頁進一步了解 Yahoo 知識+ 停止服務的事宜,以及了解如何下載你的資料。

?
Biblical history. Christian. (If you are atheist, read the Bible, it'll scare the hell out of you) If you have read any of the following: Dawkins: "The God Delusion" Dawkins: "The Greatest Show on Earth:" Hitchens: "God Is Not Great" Dennett: "Breaking the Spell" Harris: "Letter to a Christian Nation" Stenger: "God: The Failed Hypothesis" Then I challenge you to read the following: McGrath: "The Dawkins Delusion" Sarfati: "The Greatest Hoax on Earth?" Aikman: "The Delusion of Disbelief" Day: "The Irrational Atheist" Ward: "Why There Almost Certainly Is a God: Doubting Dawkins" Hahn & Wiker: "Answering the New Atheism" Ross: "More Than a Theory" Zacharias: "The End of Reason" ----------------------------------------------------------------------
In computers, whats the difference?
of buying used, rebuilt?
My HPlaptop is 6yrs old, getting slow.
Or should I buy new?
4 個解答Computer Networking9 年前BIBLICAL SCHOLARS? Where were they?
What do Modern Bible Versions have in Common?
Revised Version
American Standard Version
Revised Standard Version
New American Standard Version
New International Version
New King James Version
and others.....
There was not one "Biblical" Scholar
on the Committees.
WHO WAS ON THE COMMITTEES?
Greek linguists
Hebrew etymologists
Destructive critics
Infidels
Catholics
Apostates
Authorities on "word studies"
Lexicographers
Evolutionists
Socialists
Backslidden Christians
Editors
Collators
Textual critics
Demons
Satan
9 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前JW's: The name Jehovah?
Is a transliteration of Hebrew radicals that have never been translated.
JW's have been taught the idea that "LORD IS JEHOVAH",and Lord is "JESUS", a created god.
The AV1611 Bible preserves "LORD" in Revelation 19.16, INDICATING that
JESUS CHRIST is JEHOVAH. (Acts 20.28)
11 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前JW's: 7th Day Adventist: Revelation 14.11?
One of the clearest passages in the New Testament
on the eternal punishment of the lost in hell?
7 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前Atheists & evolutionists: The 1st two Laws of Thermodynamics?
were stated in Nehemiah 9 and Isiah 51 before Newton figured out gravity?
Since the 2 Laws contradict evolution, evolutionists are stuck with
Ps 8, 19, 78, Malachi 2, Isiah 40, and Acts 14?
9 個解答Biology9 年前Atheists & evolutionists: The 1st two Laws of Thermodynamics?
were stated in Nehemiah 9 and Isiah 51 before Newton figured out gravity?
Since the 2 Laws contradict evolution, evolutionists are stuck with
Ps 8, 19, 78, Malachi 2, Isiah 40, and Acts 14?
16 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前Friend wants to hide money in his house or outdoors?
What's some good spots?
6 個解答Other - Society & Culture9 年前To be fossils, they have to be buried quickly?
"Authorities" so-called, say fossil-bearing sedimentary deposits were laid down very
slowly (one foot in 3000 years)?
If so, how, then, were the fossils buried quickly?
17 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前JW's, the 144,000 found?
The 12 tribes with 12,000 sealed witnesses from each are all Jews, right?
The tribes are listed: JUDA, REUBEN, GAD, ASER, NEPTHALIM, MANASSES,
SIMEON, LEVI, ISSACHAR, ZABULON, JOSEPH, BENJAMIN, right?
We're still looking for the JW tribe? Could it be in the book of Baloney 1.1?
No disrespect intended, can you explain for us'ins looking to understand JW beliefs?
7 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前WHY ARE THERE FOSSILS?
If rock layers need millions of years to form, how do we still find many well-preserved fossils in those rocks?
Most dead animals decay quickly or are eaten by scavengers fairly quickly after death. But in the uniformitarian view the dead animal must lay there long enough undisturbed by scavengers and without decaying for sediment to build up around it to fossilize it.
Even allowing for hypothetical conditions in which animals decayed less quickly, the amount of time for slow and gradual fossilization means that we should find very few or no well-preserved fossils.
Local floods could account for individual fossil beds, but not the big picture of all the sedimentary layers and well-preserved fossils around the world.
This gives us the impression of a global event, such as the world wide flood happening in a matter of days or weeks.
Local floods would not leave fossils covering our whole planet.
7 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前WHY ARE THERE FOSSILS?
If rock layers need millions of years to form, how do we still find many well-preserved fossils in those rocks?
Most dead animals decay quickly or are eaten by scavengers fairly quickly after death. But in the uniformitarian view the dead animal must lay there long enough undisturbed by scavengers and without decaying for sediment to build up around it to fossilize it.
Even allowing for hypothetical conditions in which animals decayed less quickly, the amount of time for slow and gradual fossilization means that we should find very few or no well-preserved fossils.
Local floods could account for individual fossil beds, but not the big picture of all the sedimentary layers and well-preserved fossils around the world.
This gives us the impression of a global event, such as the world wide flood happening in a matter of days or weeks.
Local floods would not leave fossils covering our whole planet.
3 個解答Biology9 年前Darwde? Are you behind the curve?
4. "Common traits in embryos. Humans, dogs, snakes, fish, monkeys, eels (and many more life forms) are all considered "chordates" because we belong to the phylum Chordata. One of the features of this phylum is that, as embryos, all these life forms have gill slits, tails, and specific anatomical structures involving the spine. For humans (and other non-fish) the gill slits reform into the bones of the ear and jaw at a later stage in development. But, initially, all chordate embryos strongly resemble each other. "
Oh yeah? you're behind the curve. There are not gills, it's folds in the human embryos.
Hackle lied.
The tail bone is in humans to hold up the guts, & part of the immune system, & controls the BM
and bladder, & sitting up & walking Straight .
Do some catching up dude.
1 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前Was King James a homosexual?
I've been told by several "pastors" (one a NASV using Baptist)
that King James was a homosexual. I asked them where they heard that.
They said they heard it in their cemetery (sorry, I meant seminary),
and they were told to not tell their church members.
If it were true, I was ready to burn my KJV Bible and
leave the Christian Faith. I did not want a Bible authorized
by a homosexual.
It took me 8 months to finally find the truth. (I always verify if possible).
King James had enemies. One was Anthony Weldon, that was excluded
from James' court. Weldon swore vengeance and in 1650, 25 years after
the death of James, he saw his chance. Weldon wrote a paper calling James
a homosexual. James, being dead, was in no condition to defend himself.
The report was largely ignored since their were still enough people alive who
knew Weldon was a nut case and the charge untrue. Years later, it was picked up
by people that hoped to defame James, therefore that would tarnish the Authorized
Bible and turn Christians away from God's Book to more "modern" translations.
Today, where the lie was in footnotes and not to be believed, no more footnotes,
and the "Professors" are telling the students the lie. So they can impress the students with their "knowledge"?
8 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前Was King James a homosexual?
I've been told by several "pastors" (one a NASV using Baptist)
that King James was a homosexual. I asked them where they heard that.
They said they heard it in their cemetery (sorry, I meant seminary),
and they were told to not tell their church members.
If it were true, I was ready to burn my KJV Bible and
leave the Christian Faith. I did not want a Bible authorized
by a homosexual.
It took me 8 months to finally find the truth. (I always verify if possible).
King James had enemies. One was Anthony Weldon, that was excluded
from James' court. Weldon swore vengeance and in 1650, 25 years after
the death of James, he saw his chance. Weldon wrote a paper calling James
a homosexual. James, being dead, was in no condition to defend himself.
The report was largely ignored since their were still enough people alive who
knew Weldon was a nut case and the charge untrue. Years later, it was picked up
by people that hoped to defame James, therefore that would tarnish the Authorized
Bible and turn Christians away from God's Book to more "modern" translations.
Today, where the lie was in footnotes and not to be believed, no more footnotes,
and the "Professors" are telling the students the lie. So they can impress the students with their "knowledge"?
Jack, should this be deleted?
I think it should have been.?
Qur’an Sura 8:12b, “… terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.”
3 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前Brilliant in its simplicity....?
A. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.
B. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women.
C. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.
D. In three generations, there will be no Democrats.
Damn - I love it when a plan comes together!?
4 個解答Other - Politics & Government9 年前JW's, to get the NWT for you, in 1920?
The WT Brooklyn group stated "The following words, found in the common version (King James AV),are not found in the oldest MSS, and are no part of the divine word. Let each Berean go through his Bible, pencil in hand, and mark out these words (list follows, over 2000 words)". ?
1. Are older MSS better? They used the Sinaitic & the Vatican Greek texts, 2 of the oldest & most
corrupt MSS ever made, found in trash cans in a catholic monastery. ?
2. They used these MSS because they agreed with JW's rejecting the Deity of Jesus. ?
3. The JW's changed the references to His Deity in over 23 places. ?
Are these historical documented facts true?
Just wondering your stand on the issue?
7 個解答Religion & Spirituality9 年前WHY IS IT WHEN I ASK A QUESTION REGARDING EVOLUTION?
WHY IS IT WHEN I ASK A QUESTION REGARDING EVOLUTION?
The questions are meant to make people think (for maybe 4 seconds)?
But it seems all I get is people take can not interpret data, but just memorize
and regurgitate their favorite interpretation of their teachers?
3 個解答Higher Education (University +)9 年前