soppy.bollocks

Chinese bikes and scooters now outsell Japanese in the UK. It is said that the 2nd wave of Chinese motorcycles are reliable and cost affective. Any stories?

Chinese bikes and scooters now outsell Japanese in the UK. It is said that the 2nd wave of Chinese motorcycles are reliable and cost affective. Any stories?

If there is one, I looked on-line and couldn't find one. Cheers

I have one and went to see my doctor who said that nothing needed to be done about it. I want to know if I can still exercise at the gym, he said it's okay but I don't trust this bloke! Would anyone know?

I'm a Englishman working as a motorcycle journalist in China and have noticed that the British government is encouraging the use of e-vehicles. What do you think of this? Also, what kind of specifications should an e-vehicle have? Thanks for your time.

Dave

I'm a Englishman working as a motorcycle journalist in China and have noticed that the British government is encouraging the use of e-vehicles. What do you think of this? Also, what kind of specifications should an e-vehicle have? Thanks for your time.

Dave

To the UK. Or would i need a special licence?

I have written a series of children's poetry books and I'm looking to submit them to a publisher in the UK. Any ideas?

Did factories have to stop production? Please let me know if you have any information

What i mean is that all of the schemas that we can think have a basis in empirical sense-perception. To describe something (anything) as self-creating or uncaused is quite a unique thing as there is nothing in nature (or laws of physics) that answers to this description. How then are we able to label a diety (or anything) in this way?

I've given a lot of thought to this subject and have concluded that pretty much every schema my mind constructs is of an empirical nature (either an object given to me by sense perception or an amalgam of obejects). The only non-empirical schema I can think of currently is that of the 'uncaused cause.' This schema cannot possibly have its roots in sense perception (even as an amalgam) as an un-caused cause is not apparent in nature (at least the physical realm). can you please help me to find some more non-empirical schemas (if there are any)?

...as an un-caused cause or self-creating...cheers

It seems that there hasn't been a famous proof since Kant, can anyone refute this or explain why? Cheers!

By this I mean a cause of itself (an uncaused particle)

It seems to me that it would have to be seeing as we cannot percieve anything 'uncaused' with our sense receptors. Furthermore I would posit that this schema is the ONLY non-empirical concept we can cognise. What do you think?

Are there any that you know of?

If we look closely at the schemas we cognise it's pretty much revealed that most all of them are an amalgam of empirical sense-data. UFOs, Golden Mountains, Unicorns etc are examples of this. A colleage of mine suggests that existentialism is non-empirical, but in which way is it?

Can you give me any examples of non-empirical ideas, as to me everything seems to have its genesis in sense-data

I have always maintained that for something to be labelled 'infinite' it must suggest that that 'something' must at first have been in principle 'measurable' as it would be impossible to classifly something as infinite without first trying to measure it. What do you think

...you can explain (in very simple terms) the Schrodinger's cat experiment. I am a bit of a thicky and have been trying to get my head around it to no avail.